Asked by state prosecutors to testify as a key witness in the case against former Ghana Football Association President Kwasi Nyantakyi, Anas Aremeyaw Anas declined, stating that he would rather protect his security and safety than reveal his identity to the suspect before testifying in court.
Following a ruling by the Accra High Court, presided over by Justice Marie Louise Simmons on May 17, allowing Nyantakyi to identify him in chambers before he testifies in open court while wearing a face mask, the renowned investigative journalist made his decision.
However, Anas’s private investigation company, Tiger Eye PI, stated that if he made a statement, he would not be available to testify because disclosing his identity in an effort to appear as a witness in court would jeopardize his security.
Tiger Eye PI stated in the statement that it is not willing to lose any more of its investigators after one of them, Ahmed Suale, was killed on the same day he had meetings with the Attorney General’s office regarding his testimony against the defendant in this particular case.
A Tiger Eye PI undercover investigational documentary that showed Nyantakyi accepting bribes and engaging in influence peddling led to his prosecution.
Read the full statement by Tiger Eye P.I below:
NYANTAKYI AND LAWYERS TO SEE ANAS’S FACE BEFORE COURT PROCEEDINGS
RE: REPUBLIC V. KWESI NYANTAKYI AND ANOTHER
1. Tiger Eye P.I has taken notice of the ruling by the High Court sitting in Accra to allow undercover journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas to testify wearing mask in open court on condition that he shows his face to the accused person in the judges’ chambers first.
2.Anas had earlier agreed to testify as a witness for the prosecution in the above styled case after Ahmed Hussein Suale was gruesomely murdered, on condition that his identity is protected.
3.Anas’s request for the protection of his identity stems from his role as an undercover agent and the real and elevated risk that revealing his identity to the accused person will severely compromise his physical security and personal safety.
4.It should be recalled that the late Ahmed Hussein Suale, a star witness in this case, was assassinated in broad daylight in 2019. His assassination occurred on the same day that he had had engagements with the Attorney General’s office on his testimony against the accused person in above styled case.
5.Prior to his gruesome murder, the late Ahmed Suale had been threatened with death by Mr Kwesi Nyantakyi and had been the subject of callous media attacks for his role as a star witness in the case, culminating in the revealing of his identity on national television and social media by Mr Kennedy Agyapong, the MP for Assin-Central constituency.
6.As much as Anas is willing and ready to testify for the prosecution, doing so under the condition specified by the court, presents a clear and present danger to his security and safety, especially because of the issues chronicled above.
7.Under these circumstances, prudence requires that he declines the invitation to endanger his life and accordingly declines the invitation to reveal his identity to the accused person in the judges’ chamber or any other place.
8.Tiger Eye endorses the position of Anas and states that it is proper and wise to err on the side of caution to avoid any potential attack on another of its investigators.
9.Tiger Eye’s position is further buttressed by the unrelenting, coordinated, and well-financed media and other campaigns by private and State actors to undermine its operations and the Anas principle, which stand in their way of amassing corruption and social injustice.
10. Nevertheless, Tiger Eye shall remain unwavering and relentless in its fight against corruption and societal ills. Anas remains in high spirit and is grateful to the good people of Ghana for their support and protection.
